To live with bears, we may need to kill some bears

CRAIG MEDRED
OUTDOORS

(04/20/09 22:07:41)If you are coming to Anchorage this summer, be afraid — beary, beary afraid.
If you live here, go inside now. Bar the doors. Lock the windows. And start loading the guns.
It’s spring and time for “Bear Attack!”
Discovery Channel, the cable TV network, was all over this last week on its Alaska Week, where everything about the 49th state became X-treme!
Here was the “Bear Attack!” promo:
“In a short time, three people are viciously mauled by a bear in the Anchorage area, and many more have dangerously close encounters. Could one aggressive bear be responsible for all these attacks? What is increasing the rate of bear-human urban encounters?”
In the video itself, “Bear Attack!” producers go on the hunt for an imaginary bear that mighta, coulda, we-only-wish-it-woulda been a “rogue bear” terrorizing the city.
They eventually concede such a bear never existed, before pointing out that it could have.
Why, in Kamchatka last year, or so it is portrayed, a whole gang of bears went on a rampage at a mine, feasting on two guards and injecting terror into the hearts of miners who then apparently locked themselves in the mine tunnels, or so it would appear in the “Bear Attack!” video.
As with most tall tales, there is a grain of truth to this one. The world press had a field day with the mauling deaths of two mine guards last summer.
The Times of London reported it this way:
“Terrified workers at a mining compound in one of Russia’s most isolated regions are refusing to go to work after a pack of giant bears attacked and ate two of their colleagues.
“At least 30 of the hungry animals have been seen prowling close to the mines in northern Kamchatka in search of food, where the mangled remains of the two workers, both guards, were found last week.
“The co-workers at the compound in the Olyotorsky district are trapped and frightened: the gruesome discovery has left them too scared to venture out. A team of snipers, with orders to shoot the bears, is now being dispatched to confront the invasion.”
As it later turned out, the guards were apparently killed, but not eaten, by bears attracted to community garbage. Gatherings of bears to feast on human refuse — garbage to us, easy calories to them — used to be a common thing in Alaska.
If you wanted to see a grizzly on Admiralty Island west of Juneau back before it became a national monument, the easiest thing to do was go to the dump in the nearby village of Angoon. “Packs” of bears were sometimes there feeding.
Over the past two decades, Alaska has made a concerted effort to clean up its dumps so they are not bear magnets. But several bears were killed in and around a waste transfer station in Cooper Landing last year, and a young woman was mauled not far away at the Kenai Princess Lodge. She survived.
There remains little doubt that if you bait bears into a community with garbage or a big run of salmon in a midtown stream and you then throw a bunch of people into the mix, something bad will happen.
As Anchorage discovered last summer, most of the bears will avoid most of the people most of the time. And some of the bears will avoid all of the people all of the time. But you can’t expect all of the bears to avoid all of the people all of the time.
It’s likely one of the maulings here began with a human attacking a bear, albeit accidentally. Teenage mountain-bike racer Petra Davis may have collided — or nearly collided — with a bear in the dark along Campbell Creek, setting off the attack that left her seriously injured.
Not that it was her fault. Davis could have been any of us who mountain bike regularly around Anchorage. One of my Hillside neighbors and I have both come close to T-boning bears on area trails. The risk goes with living in bear country.
How big is the risk?
Discovery contends there were nine violent brown bear “attacks” in Anchorage city limits over six weeks last summer. The reality is more like two violent attacks, six scary encounters and one who-knows-what — the latter being 18-year-old Devon Rees’ street fight with a bear at 2 a.m. out in Eagle River. Rees ended up nipped a few times.
It was pretty clear early on that there was no rogue bear. There were two bear attacks — Rees and Davis — which involved rare, chance encounters between people and bears at very close range in the dark or near dark.
And there were a whole bunch of incidents, including a mauling involving an unusually aggressive Hillside Park-area sow with cubs.
In “Bear Attack!”, Alaska Department of Fish and Game wildlife biologist Rick Sinnott portrays this bear as the “good mother,” which has pretty much been the agency’s position from the get go.
So let’s see, I’m the father of a daughter. She attracts male friends. If I get aggressive with some of them, and then pound the snot out of one because I just don’t like the looks of him, does that make me the “good father”?
It’s time to give some thought to this because bears are emerging from their dens in the mountains above Anchorage. They will soon start coming down into town. Most will try to avoid us. A few will probably prove less than vigilant at all times and thus encounter people before fleeing in terror.
But there is always the possibility there will again be a rare bear unable to grasp the idea of how to behave properly around humans. There are two things that can be done about that bear:
Fish and Game can try to identify it quickly, kill it and remove the threat to public safety.
Or we can give our green spaces over to the bear, much like we did last year; wait for the inevitable mauling sure to come anyway and get ready for the next TV crew to arrive.
This doesn’t seem like a difficult choice. To live with the bears, we may need to kill some bears.
I know this will be troubling to a few, but people killing bears to make our joint living arrangements work is largely the way it has been with Alaskans and bears for about 10,000 years.
Then again, I guess we could go inside now. Bolt the doors. Lock the windows. And stay until the snow flies.
If you DO come across a bear standing on his hind legs – that’s when he’s in attack mode – I’ve heard that you should crap a big load in your pants. Seriously. It supposedly drives them away. You DON’T want to attack with a small gun – it will only piss the bear off more.
Comment by Dien — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by hill bill y — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by William — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by boker_magnum — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by Aaron — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by joshuagertsch — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by fishslayer1986 — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
This makes the bear think that you are not a threat to the bear. Good luck out there.
Comment by surfer dude — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by dca2003311@yahoo.com — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
First off carrying that bear spray is the best idea here. While carrying a second large caliber rifle is unpractical what about a handgun? Six shots from a a .44 mag into a 250 pound black bear’s chest will witout a doubt drop it. If can’t buy or access a heavy revolver than aim at his head with the 30-30. It will kill it. Black bear are not that big a .30 size round won’t penetrate it’s skull. But the bear spray is best cheapest most proven way to go.
Comment by kyle h — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Lot’s of hunters carry .44 Magnum revolvers as backup in bear country. The .44 Mag. is not better than a .30-30 carbine, so there you have it.
Good luck and happy hunting.
H
Comment by H — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by Boris859 — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
now, for your question:
people use the .30/30 win for black bear withing 100 yards, whether you will believe this is another matter. if i ever hunt where i know that there is a possibility that i will encounter dangerous animals like Kodiak bear i will be hunting with a buddy that has a gun or by myself with a revolver. don’t go for body shots, as bear can absorb bullets like nothing, but if you but two in its head, it will go down.
when I’m 21, i will be getting my concealed carry permit and a pistol, somewhere in the .38, .40, .357 or .45 ACP area. nothing smaller than a .38.
good luck hope you get the deer you want this year.
Comment by burnzwater — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by bghoundawg — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
shoot a bear in the same place you shoot deer, in the heart or head a 30-30 will do the job just fine. as for the 44 mag pistol its pretty marginal. here’s the ballistics. 30-30 150 or 170 grain =more than 1600 ft. lbs. energy .44 mag pistol 7 1/5 in barrel 240 grain bullet = 971 ft lbs energy. use the same bullets for black bear as you do for deer. they probably wont exit as they are made to expand & dump all their energy inside the animal so you wont ruin the hide with a big exit wound.
if your deer hunting in brown bear country a 338 would be a more appropriate deer rifle or at a minimum a 30-06 with controled expansion bullets, 180 gr. in the chamber for deer, 220 gr. in the magazine for back up. dont take a 30-30 into brown bear country they dont have enough penetration for grizzly.
Comment by crash — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
We of course live in the land of Daniel Boone who happened to kill bears with a knife. If he can do it ,we sure can , Right?
Comment by dirtydan2 — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by Big D — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by tater — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
Comment by Mad Dog — April 22, 2009 @ 7:12 am
So I tried this, I yelled jibberish like I was at some pentecostal sunday meeting. This confused the bear and gave us both a chance to think about a different situation…”I think I’ll go over there, now.” He also said (and it makes sense to me) never to lay on the ground. Bears are omnivores and do eat carrion. I won’t sit still and die without giving the bear “what-for” !
I would honor the bear but if it came down between us and I had my .45 I would aim for the eye. The eyes are also good for other situations. Most battles will end with a gouged out eye.