Lethal App News » wolves

Autopsy of Alaskan Teacher Confirms Death by Animal Mauling

Posted: March 19th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Link

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A teacher jogging along a rural Alaskan road was killed in an animal attack and authorities say wolves are the chief suspects.

The body of Candice Berner, 32, was found Monday off the road a mile outside the village of Chignik Bay on the Alaska Peninsula, which is about 474 miles southwest of Anchorage.

Authorities said the body had been dragged off the road to the village’s lagoon and was surrounded by wolf tracks.

In an autopsy report Thursday, the Alaska State Medical Examiner listed “multiple injuries due to animal mauling” as the cause of death for Berner, a special education teacher originally from Slippery Rock, Pa., who began working in Alaska in August.

The autopsy could not say which animals, said Col. Audie Holloway, head of the Alaska State Troopers, but wolves are the chief suspect.

“There’s no other carnivores in that area that are out and active,” he said.

Wolves, bears, foxes and other wildlife have disturbed bodies in the Alaska wilderness, but Holloway said the autopsy ruled out other causes that may have killed Berner. Additional tests could tie the death to wolves, Holloway said.

“If we’re able to actually prove which animal, it will be through some kind of DNA analysis or through some expert that can maybe testify or explain how they know that it’s a wolf,” he said.

Troopers have plenty of circumstantial evidence leading them to point the finger at wolves.

“There were wolf tracks all around the body, and drag marks associated with those wolf tracks,” Holloway said.

Tracks indicated more than one wolf was involved.

“From the number of prints at the scene, we’re thinking there probably were, possibly, two, three, maybe four,” Holloway said.

Wolf attacks on humans are rare and there has not been a documented case of a wolf killing a human in Alaska. But concerns over the large predators persist.

In 2007, villagers in the western Eskimo village of Marshall posted sentries at night on the town periphery to keep wolves out after a pack of wolves attacked and killed six sled dogs. A wolf killed by villagers turned out to be rabid.

In Chignik Bay, a community of 105 residents, villagers were already were on alert because of wolves running boldly nearby, said Johnny Lind, president of the village council.

In comments Thursday before the autopsy results were announced, Lind said wolf involvement was apparent.

“It’s obvious. Goodness. It’s obvious,” he said.

Since Tuesday, people were not traveling alone, school children were accompanied to school and armed patrols on snowmobiles were looking for wolves, he said.

“Everybody’s kind of staying close to the village,” he said.

Multiple calls left for the spokeswoman of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Jennifer Yuhas, were not returned Thursday.

Most adult male wolves in Alaska weigh 85 to 115 pounds but they occasionally reach 145 pounds, according to the Department of Fish and Game. Females average 5 to 10 pounds lighter than males and rarely weigh more than 110 pounds. Wolves reach adult size by about 1 year of age, and the largest wolves occur where prey is abundant year round.

Rick Luthi, the Lake and Peninsula School District’s chief operating officer, said Berner during her short time in Alaska tried to take in as many experiences as she could. The district distributed a photo of her on a district outing catching crab.

“She wasn’t going to miss anything about living in that area,” he said.

Under 5 feet tall, Berner had boxed and lately had been training for long-distance running.

“She was a gymnast by early training and was in very good physical condition,” Luthi said.


Alaskan Schoolteacher Likely Killed by Wolf

Posted: March 11th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Link

A FEMALE special education teacher was mauled to death by a wolf while jogging in Alaska, authorities told local media.

The body of 32-year-old Candice Berner, originally from Pennsylvania, was found Monday night off a road leading to the Chignik Lake airstrip, The News Tribune reported.

Police investigating the case believe she was killed in an “animal attack, possibly a wolf attack” after locals reported wolf sightings.

The people who found the woman’s body while returning from clam digging say that a wolf stalked one of them earlier in the day, the Alaska Dispatch reported.

The woman’s death is still under investigation and her body is being taken to Anchorage for an autopsy, police said.

Candice’s father, Bob Berner, told The News Tribune his daughter was a “small and mighty” woman who liked to box, lift weights and run. She was running in training for a race, he said.

Berner was a traveling special education teacher based in Perryville who had just arrived in Chignik to work at the school in the area, said local school officials.


Avoid Wildlife Attacks in Jasper National Park

Posted: April 30th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: bears, elk, moose, mountain lions, wildlife, wolves | Tags: , | No Comments »

Link

How To: Prevent Conflicts with Jasper Wildlife
Although Jasper’s park animals appear unconcerned, all wild animals are unpredictable and potentially dangerous.

Families of bighorn sheep relax in Jasper.

Families of bighorn sheep relax in Jasper.

1. Do NOT feed or disturb wildlife.
2. Never leave food attractants out for wildlife. Food attractants include:
- coolers (they are NOT bearproof!)
- food scraps or leftovers
- dishwater
- dirty dishes, pots or barbecues
- empty bottles, cans or wrappers
- toothpaste, soap or other toiletries
- pets
- pet food dishes (full or empty)

3. Be aware of your surroundings at all times.
Because it is impossible to predict how wildlife will react in any situation, avoiding encounters is the only sure way to keep people safe and wildlife wild.
- Always watch out for animals or signs of their presence.
- Carefully supervise children whenever outdoors.

4. Always keep your distance.
Do not approach or entice wildlife. Use binoculars or a telephoto lens instead. Remain at least:
- 100 metres away from BEARS, COUGARS and WOLVES
- 30 metres away from ELK, DEER, SHEEP, GOATS and MOOSE

5. When Driving:
Be on the lookout for animals near the road. Drive with utmost caution, especially at dusk and dawn, when many animals are most active, and visibility is poor.

If you see an animal by the road:
* Slow down. It could run out into your path at any time.
* Warn other motorists by flashing your hazard lights.
* Where there is one animal, expect others nearby.

If you wish to stop and view roadside wildlife:
* Pull safely out of traffic.
* Remain in your vehicle.
* Move on after a few minutes.

Insider Tips: ABOUT JASPER’S ANIMALS

Be mindful that Jasper’s wildlife is truly wild–unpredictable and potentially dangerous. And therefore, you must act according to the rules of nature.

PREDATORS.

Coyotes roam wild in Jasper.

Coyotes roam wild in Jasper.

If a cougar, wolf or coyote approaches you, send a clear message that you are NOT potential prey.
* Pick up small children immediately.
* Yell.
* Do anything you can to make yourself look bigger.
* Be prepared to use pepper spray if you have it.
* Fight back aggressively if attacked.
* DO NOT crouch, play dead, run, or turn your back to the animal.

PETS.
To a carnivore, your PET may look appetizing.
* Keep dogs on a leash and walk them in open areas during daylight hours only.
* Do not leave pets unattended outside.

Enjoy elk from a distance.

Enjoy elk from a distance.

ELK.
As docile as they may seem, elk are wild animals too. Getting too close to elk may incite attacks, which have occurred at any time of the year. Females are most aggressive during the May/June calving season, and males are especially dangerous during the September/October period.

BEARS.
What should I do if I see a BEAR?

1. If you are driving: stay in your car, and consider not stopping.
2. If you are not in a vehicle:
* Stay calm. If a bear rears on its hind legs and waves its nose about, it is trying to identify you. Remain still and talk calmly so that it knows you are human and not a prey animal. Bears may also run toward you and turn away at the last moment. A scream or sudden movement may trigger an attack.
* Pick up children, stay in a group.
* Back away slowly. Do not run.
* Leave the area. If this is impossible, wait until the bear leaves; make sure it has an escape route.

3. Reduce your risk of a surprise encounter:

Make sure you are bear-wary.

Make sure you are bear-wary.

* Make noise. Clap, sing or yell to announce your presence, especially where a bear might not otherwise smell, hear or see you coming. (Bear bells are not very effective.)
* Travel in groups, on established trails, and during daylight hours.
* Minimize odours by proper storage of food, garbage and toiletries.
* Leave the area if you see a bear or fresh tracks, droppings, diggings; or if you come across a large dead animal (a bear may be nearby).

4. If you surprise a bear and it defends itself:
* Use bear spray if you have it. PLAY DEAD, let it know you are not a threat: lie on stomach with legs apart, cover back of head and neck with hands, keep pack on to protect your back.

5. If a bear stalks you and then attacks, or attacks at night:
* Try to escape, use bear spray if you have it. FIGHT BACK, let it know that you are not easy prey. (This kind of predatory attack is very rare.)


Wolves and Mountain Lions in New Hampshire? Officials Skeptical.

Posted: April 29th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: mountain lions, wildlife, wolves | Tags: , , , , | No Comments »

Link

Experts remain dubious about existence of wolves, mountain lions in the wilds of the Granite State
By JOHN KOZIOL
jkoziol@citizen.com
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Picture 

Citizen Photo/John Koziol A COYOTE, held by Animal Care Manager Katie Mokkosian, investigates the grounds at the Squam Lakes Natural Science Center in Holderness.

* Order a print of this photo 

Wolves and mountain lions in New Hampshire? Maybe, but not conclusively, say local, state and federal wildlife experts.

The experts — Patrick Tate, a wildlife biologist and the furbearer project leader for the New Hampshire Fish & Game Department; Michael Amaral, biologist and endangered species supervisor for the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service; and Dave Erler, senior naturalist at the Squam Lakes Natural Science Center — also agree that wolves will, and mountain lions may, one day return to New Hampshire.

And, the trio concurs, the way to spike reports of sightings of what had once been the top predators in the Granite State is to publish an article like this one.

But they also agree that despite numerous reports — as well as a popular thread on the winnipesaukee.com forum about possible wolves in Central New Hampshire — there’s been no tangible proof that either the wolf or mountain lion has come home, yet, and established resident breeding populations.

As for wolves, Tate, Amaral and Erler suggested that what some folks may be seeing or hearing is a wolf hybrid, which either escaped from its owner — it is legal to own a wolf-hybrid in New Hampshire provided that the animal is sterilized and kept penned up; there are 300,000 wolf hybrids in the U.S., Amaral said — or one that may have been brought here from another state.

More than likely, however, it’s a large coyote or, much less likely, a “lone wolf” far from home.

It’s also possible, said Tate, Amaral and Erler, that a mountain lion — whose ownership is permitted in some states — may have been released illegally in New Hampshire and was spotted here.

Despite a lot of speculation by the public, Tate recently noted with a mixture of befuddlement and exasperation that there is no conspiracy to suppress information about either animal, both of which were pushed out of their habitat by settlers who could ill afford to lose a valuable cow or sheep.

A history of the state’s fauna, Erler said, notes that the last wolf in New Hampshire was killed in 1895, but the book is less clear about the last mountain lion.

“There are wolves in … Canada,” Tate said, adding that one school of thought is that they could eventually make their way down to New Hampshire despite the challenge of crossing the St. Lawrence Seaway.

He believes that it is “highly likely” that wolves will return to the Granite State because there’s abundant food for them in the form of moose, deer and beaver. Tate monitors the beaver population and said wolves would help keep it in check, thereby providing a service to humans because beaver dams create a variety of roadway drainage problems.

Tate, who frequently lectures about coyotes, will put up side-by-side slides of a wolf and a coyote and then ask the audience to identify which is which.

“And nine times out of ten they’ll tell me they’re both wolves,” said Tate, who added that the Internet contributes to false identifications, as people who think they’ve seen a wolf or a mountain lion will sometimes go online to verify what they witnessed and then call Tate with what they think is a conclusive sighting. 

As to mountain lions, “the public believes the department is trying to cover up that we have mountain lions in the state and we’ve even been called up and heard rumors that the state picked up a mountain lion that was killed, but they’re just rumors,” Tate said. “They’re not true.”

Of all the photos he’s seen of purported mountain lions, “to date all have been proven to be misidentified wildlife,” he said. “They’ve been found to be anything from coyotes to dogs. One person gave us raccoon scat and we did another test where the animal wasn’t even a predator species.”

There may be wolves and mountain lions in New Hampshire, but “We just haven’t found the physical evidence. We investigate but we’re skeptical because of the amount of misidentified wildlife.”

Tate expects that Fish and Game will get a bunch of calls about wolves and mountain lions after this article is printed.

“We’ll see an influx of calls for two weeks and everyone sees them but as soon as the publicity dies down, the reports go down,” he said.

Amaral, who is based in Concord, reviews photos of suspected wolves with a group of fellow biologists who’ve studied wolves in Alaska and Canada’s Northwest Territory, “and in almost every case, that looks like a big, winter-coated coyote.”

Coyotes came to New Hampshire from the West and as they did, it is believed they interbred with wolves, producing a coyote that is about one-third larger than its western cousin, Erler said.

Apart from the fact that coyotes can breed with wolves — and to what is believed to be a very limited extent with domestic canines, resulting in the so-called “coydog” — the Catch-22 in trying to positively identify a wolf is that you need some of its DNA to verify that, genetically, it is a wolf, Amaral said. 

That job gets a little trickier, he said, because there is only one federal laboratory that does wolf DNA testing and it’s located in the West, meaning it doesn’t have an extensive collection of DNA samples of eastern wolves.

In most cases, obtaining DNA from a suspected wolf means killing the animal, which, if it turns out to be a real wolf, is then a violation of the Endangered Species Act. 

While it is legal to kill coyotes in the state, Amaral cautioned hunters to be careful.

“We need to absolutely dispel the notion of a trophy coyote,” he said. “Just get that out of your mind. If you think you’re taking a trophy coyote you might be killing a wolf.”

Erler, who was a naturalist with the National Park Service and University of Minnesota Extension Service before coming to SLNSC in 1979, said both Tate and Amaral are “optimistic” in their thinking that there might be wolves in New Hampshire.

Wolves, like coyotes and other canines, aren’t shy about leaving signs of their presence behind, said Erler, who during an interview last week at the SLNSC pointed to some coyote scat right in the middle of a trail.

Also, if there were wolves around, we’d see not only their droppings but the remains of what they’ve been eating, Erler said, whereas a mountain lion would be more fastidious in doing their business and would also secret their prey away. And, Erler added, you wouldn’t be seeing coyotes around because while they might occasionally breed with them, wolves do not like coyotes and will kill and eat them.

Wolves also kill differently than coyotes, Erler said.

A coyote will try to bring its prey down by pulling at its shoulder or throat, while wolves, he said, will “hamstring” an animal, biting through leg muscles to prevent its running away to safety.

It’s understandable that people who aren’t used to seeing wolves can easily mistake a coyote for a wolf and it’s also understandable, if not predictable, Erler said, that he will get reports about mountain lions after someone visits the SLNSC.

“We get calls all the time about mountain lions because we have them on exhibit,” Erler said. “You’re not more than two steps removed from somebody claiming they saw it themselves or knowing someone who did.”

For the record, the seven-year-old mountain lions at the SLNSC are brother and sister and came as orphans from Montana.

Asked about the public fascination with mountain lions and wolves, Erler said it was natural.

“I think people tend to be drawn to things that are a little dangerous, as long as it’s not an immediate threat,” he said. “And we have had enough time go by and we’re not an agricultural community on a subsistence level where a wolf or mountain lion taking down your dairy cow would be huge economically and the predator would be considered enemy number one.”

Also, the Internet and television channels like Animal Planet “allow people to see animals that they could never really appreciate before,” Erler said. “People understand the natural order of predation a lot better than in prior centuries.”

Amaral said wolves now coexist with humans in parts of Europe, including Italy and Portugal.

“So wolves can live with people, but can people live with wolves?” Amaral inquired. “If they see an interesting-looking animal and want to take a picture of it, we’re happy to look at it. But otherwise the best thing they can do is not to attract these animals to their homes and leave them alone.”

Nonetheless, the wolves are coming one day, Amaral said.

“The table has been set for a while. We’re just waiting for the dinner guest to arrive.” 


Wolf Attack Victim’s Parents Suing

Posted: April 17th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , | No Comments »

Link

Can’t say I blame them!

The parents of a girl who was bitten by a wolf during a show April 4 at Grizzly Jack’s Grand Bear Lodge in Utica filed a lawsuit in the matter Thursday.

Tom and Rhonda Giachetto, of Ladd, filed the suit against Sidney Yost and his California-based company, Amazing Animal Productions, the lodge and the lodge’s owners, Joseph Hook, Keith Wolick and Susan Wolick. The Giachettos’ attorney is Anthony Raccuglia, of Peru.

The 2-year-old girl was bit around her head, with bites reaching to the muscles and tendons of her face, according to the suit. The wolf was on a leash with a handler, when it came from behind a curtain on the stage and attacked the girl who was walking by the stage. The parents are saying no warning had been given that the wolf was behind the curtain. The parents are seeking at least $400,000.


Wolves attack family dog

Posted: April 8th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , | No Comments »

Link

A dog owner’s worst nightmare – seeing a wolf pack carry off your beloved pet.

Wolf pack attacks family dog

Jaguar Road families living in fear

Posted By Chelsey Romain, The Daily Press

A local family has nothing to do but sit idly by and hope their family pet pulls through.

The Parcey family’s collie-shepherd cross, Missy, has become the most recent victim of a wolf attack on Jaguar Road.

Late Monday night, Monica Parcey looked outside to see a pack of wolves dragging her 11-year-old dog into a field.

Calling out to her husband, Bob, Monica said most of the wolves did nothing but simply stare back at her, while her husband ran outside shouting.

“There were at least 10 of them that I saw,” Monica told The Daily Press, adding that Missy was a regular outside dog, weighing about 85 pounds.

“She’s always outside, and if there’s anything around she usually barks and lets us know.”

But Missy didn’t bark when the wolves approached her, making Monica think that an east-blowing wind prevented the dog from smelling or hearing them.

“She didn’t have a chance,” Monica said. “I saw something on the ground and knew it was her.”

Bob was quickly out the door and ran to the garage, where he screamed at the remaining wolves before finally the largest of the pack let go of Missy and turned away.

Missy somehow managed to pick herself up and walk to the garage, where Bob was waiting. Missy was rushed to the Timmins Animal Hospital.

“She’s been very heavily sedated, because there are so many open wounds” said Monica, who said she hasn’t seen the dog since it was brought in.

“She fought back. She’s a pretty tough girl.”

Bob said the wolves had managed to rip open the side of Missy, exposing her ribs, and there was puncture wounds throughout her body.

He said Dr. Ed Butterworth seems to think Missy will be OK, but is worried about possible internal bleeding.

Because her thick winter coat acted as a barrier, Monica said a lot of the wounds could have been worse.

The Parceys aren’t the first family to feel the wrath of local wolves. Three families on the same road reported three dogs had been killed by wolves earlier this year.

At the time, Ministry of Natural Resources enforcement supervisor Jim Abbott said it was only assumed it had been wolves, and residents should always have their animals and livestock under their direct control.

Abbott said he had put the families in touch with a trapper, who would work with them to resolve the problem.

But Bob Parcey said he knows for sure it was wolves that dragged Missy off into the field.

“I seen them with my own eyes,” he said.

He added that he has seen the animals in the area before, but never in his backyard.

“She has been in the bush all her life, and Missy never backed down from anything,” he said.

The Parcey’s second dog, a younger retriever was left alone by the wolves, making Bob believe they went for the older, weaker of the two.

The Parceys say they always keep their house well lit at night with lights on the house, garage and in the backyard, and thought it would keep the wolves away.

But Monica said there was no fear in the wolves on Monday night.

“Those wolves were not running away from me, and that worries me,” said Bob. “I want people to know the real danger that’s out there for their dogs and most importantly, their kids.”

When questioned about the Parcey’s situation, MNR representatives said they were unable to provide comment at this time.


Wolves versus Idaho

Posted: April 8th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Link

Wolves were reintroduced to Idaho 14 years ago by the Federal Government, and many are not happy with the results of that program.

Anger over wolf management erupts

Foes of Canis lupus threaten ‘grassroots uprising’ if delisting delayed


By JASON KAUFFMAN
Express Staff Writer
Anger over conservationists’ efforts to block the removal of federal protections for wolves boiled over Saturday night during a meeting of hunters and anti-wolf activists in Hailey.

Setting the tone for the night was outspoken anti-wolf activist Ron Gillett of Stanley, director of the Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition. Gillett predicted that a lawsuit by conservation groups will derail the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s move to delist wolves from the federal Endangered Species Act.

“The wolf lovers will not allow it to happen,” he said. “They are never going to be delisted. They are never going to be hunted.”

Sponsored by the Deer Hunters of Idaho, a regional hunting organization working to maximize deer populations in the state, the meeting at the Hailey Community Campus drew more than a 100 people from the Wood River Valley and surrounding states of Montana and Wyoming. Except for a few wolf supporters, most in the crowd were hunters upset by attempts to block the handover of wolf management to states.

Bumper stickers on pickup trucks outside the event proclaiming messages such as “I Like My Canadian Wolf Fried” and “Wolves: Government Sponsored Terrorists” were an indication of the crowd’s hostility towards the predators. Many in the crowd believe Idaho is on the verge of losing its game herds to wolves.

Several hunters made it clear they don’t believe reports from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game that suggest, except in a few specific cases across the state, that elk populations are at or just a bit below normal. Rather, they claim conservationists and state wildlife officials are complicit in a cover-up about declining game herds.

“We’re going to run out of game in seven to eight years,” said Tony Mayer, co-founder of the Twin Falls-based group Save Our Elk, which calls for aggressive wolf management.

The Fish and Wildlife Service’s delisting rule for the region’s gray wolves was published in the Federal Register on April 1. The move put in motion a 30-day countdown to the removal of wolves from the ESA.

If all goes as planned, wolves will lose their protected status in all of Idaho and Montana and in portions of eastern Washington, eastern Oregon and northern Utah. Because federal officials have deemed Wyoming’s wolf management plan inadequate, the delisting will not extend to wolves in that state.

Distrust of state and federal wildlife biologists and their intentions for wolves and the preservation of big game herds in the region was a theme voiced throughout the evening. Speakers claimed that state wildlife managers are in bed with the same conservation groups that are trying to keep them from taking over management from the federal government.

“The Idaho Fish and Game has people in there that are wolf lovers,” Gillett said.

He joined others in calling for an unspecified type of “civil disobedience” should the delisting not proceed as planned. Legislation that anti-wolf activists are attempting to have introduced into the Idaho Legislature would protect anyone accused of taking part in the “grassroots uprising,” he added without elaborating.

State wildlife managers were invited to the meeting by the organizers. Sitting near the front of the large auditorium as Gillett and others berated the agency were Cal Groen, director of Fish and Game, and Jerome Hansen, the department’s Magic Valley regional supervisor. Later in the meeting, Groen tried to convince the irate crowd that Fish and Game’s goal is to manage wolves in concert with big game herds just like any other predator species in Idaho, including black bears and cougars.

It’s a message the department has voiced over and over in recent years, only to be met with suspicion from both sides of the emotional issue, anti-wolf activists and conservationists alike.

Dave Burke, who lives in eastern Idaho and is a hunting and fishing outfitter both close to home and in Canada and Alaska, angrily denounced the belief that wolves live in balance with game herds. Rather, Burke claimed that wolves are creating “death zones” in Idaho’s backcountry devoid of big game.

“These things are huge—they’re monsters,” he said. “They eat the fetus. It’s like candy for them. They don’t kill to eat, they kill for fun.”

Though present for the meeting, the small contingent of conservationists kept quiet throughout the night. After being pointed to and mentioned repeatedly by Gillett, local pro-wolf activist Lynne Stone left without speaking about midway through the night. Conservationists’ attempts to film the meeting were quickly rebuffed by organizers.

Still, not everyone in the crowd was predicting as dire a scenario as speakers like Gillett. Spending much of his speech discussing why he believes a wolf hunt is needed was Matt Douthit of Bellevue, president of Deer Hunters of Idaho.

“Management of these wolves is long overdue,” he said.

Douthit, who has been filming the valley’s Phantom Hill wolf pack hunting elk near Sun Valley and Greenhorn Gulch, claimed that Fish and Game’s efforts to haze the pack away from homes is only causing them to hunt at night.

“I’m thinking hazing is not the best management tool for these wolves,” he said.

Hunters also allege that many more wolves live in the valley than Fish and Game admits. Bellevue’s Billy Ward, another meeting organizer, said signs of wolves are visible up and down the valley.

“We have five to six wolf packs,” he said.


Girl in audience attacked by wolf during animal show

Posted: April 6th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , | No Comments »

Link

How terrible to be watching an animal show and get attacked by one of the performers. There must have been a serious breakdown on the part of the show organizers.

Ladd girl attacked by wolf at Utica resort’s animal show

Monday, April 06, 2009

By Tom Collins 
courtreporter@newstrib.com
A 2½-year-old Ladd girl suffered bite wounds to her head, neck and face Saturday when a wolf attacked her during an animal show at Grand Bear Lodge in Utica.
Utica police would not release, confirm or deny the victim’s identity. The NewsTribune did learn the child’s identity and subsequently confirmed she was treated and released from Illinois Valley Community Hospital, Peru.
Police said the attack occurred at approximately 11:40 a.m. Saturday inside the resort, which is hosting Hollywood’s Amazing Animal Productions of Devore Heights, Calif. through April 12.

First confirmed fatal wolf attack in North America?

Posted: April 5th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: wildlife, wolves | Tags: , , , | 1 Comment »

Link

Although there is some debate over whether this is the first confirmed attack – or whether this is indeed a confirmed fatal wolf attack – it’s certainly an interesting story, and highlights the dangers that can increase as wolves are reintroduced to populated areas.

Be sure to read the comments on the originating article. There are a lot of fascinating viewpoints.

Conservationists have long assuaged the public’s fear of wolves by saying that there have been no documented instances of a healthy wild wolf killing a human being in North America. Until now, that is. 

On Nov. 8, a search party found the partially consumed body of 22-year-old Kenton Joel Carnegie in the woods of northern Saskatchewan. Carnegie had gone for a walk and didn’t return to the surveyors camp where he was working. 

Paul Paquet, a University of Calgary ecologist who investigated the case, says a recent increase in energy development has drawn more people to the remote area and left it peppered with open garbage dumps. Four wolves fed regularly at a nearby dump and had lost their natural fear of people. 

Those wolves are the most likely culprits, and at least three have been killed. But investigators have not yet ruled out the possibility of a bear attack. 

To prevent wolves from becoming accustomed to humans, Paquet advises securing any food left in dumps or campsites. People should stay at least 100 yards from wolves, he says. 

In the United States, there are some open dumps in wolf country, says Fish and Wildlife Service wolf recovery coordinator Ed Bangs. But, he adds, many people already bear-proof their garbage, and authorities haze overly bold wolves with noise-making “cracker shells” and rubber bullets. 

Given that a handful of fatal wolf attacks have been recorded in India and Europe, experts say such an attack in North America has always been a possibility. But the odds are extraordinarily low, points out L. David Mech, a leading wolf biologist: “Wolves are still not any more dangerous than they ever were.”